Some references and precedents

While creating this post I’m reconsidering whether references and precedents need to have their own separate categories. I may merge them into one, seeing as I will refer to my precedents often.

Precedents (people doing something about misinformation, for example, through parody):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuYPdTvqitg
Adam Ruins Everything – Why Orange Juice Is Totally Unnatural

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1rZAT2GtmI
Expiration Dates Don’t Mean What You Think

https://www.duffelblog.com/2018/01/armys-new-holistic-medics-treat-gunshot-wounds-crystals-essential-oils/

https://www.snopes.com/onion-in-your-sock-cure/

https://www.snopes.com/harvard-study-confirms-tibetan-monks-can-raise-body-temperature-with-their-minds/

https://www.snopes.com/medical/homecure/honey.asp

https://www.snopes.com/3d-printed-rhino-horn-developed/

https://local.theonion.com/earth-s-successful-completion-of-orbit-around-sun-inspi-1821678616

References (the science behind misinformation/research):

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2016/nov/28/breakfast-health-america-kellog-food-lifestyle

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2016/dec/12/studies-health-nutrition-sugar-coca-cola-marion-nestle

https://www.inc.com/melissa-chu/why-your-brain-prioritizes-instant-gratification-o.html

https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2009/01/marketers-ab-force-weight-loss-device-agree-pay-7-million

Advertisements